[bisq-network/proposals] Cap max reimbursement from peers security deposit (#292)

[pazza]

@MwithM 
> The cost of arbitration would be paid by the trader who violates the trading rules, not subsidized for every trade or paid by the trader who acted right.

Two ways of looking at this though. As in the case above this would penalize the trader that would receive compensation, by compensating them minus the cost of arbitration. This does not seem fair.

> And I have to add that a general trading fee increase is not a good idea. 

I agree trade fees should be kept competitive. I am not sure what the total cost of arbitrations would be divided by the sum of trade fees. I would imagine it would be in the hundredths of a percent so pretty small.



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/292#issuecomment-757068552
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210108/e54a009a/attachment.htm>