[bisq-network/bisq] For more security spongycastle -> bouncycastle (#4163)

[chimp1984]

@ripcurlx Are the any important changes? Basically we prefer to not update libs as long not needed. Risk to get new targeted vulnerabilities is higher IMO than potential security fixes for some exotic edge cases. To do it safely someone would need to review/audit all the changes there which is unfeasible from our dev work force.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/4163#issuecomment-757332475
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210109/8ff0a374/attachment.htm>