[bisq-network/proposals] Add negative score for protocol violations (#260)

RififiCastorjunior notifications at github.com
Sun Jan 10 23:17:50 CET 2021


The same argument goes for all Bisq address, for privacy breach financial authorities or other attackers they need to perform a trade and get all informations related to the Bisq address. It require an amount of time to collect those info and with discretion. 

So if a privacy breacher need to attack Bisq accounts he just have to wait and see all interesting Bisq offers with old aging address if possible, the breacher has to make trade to collect those info. This breacher become a bisq trader even if he has bad motives. He need to give away this info. So its classic risk no privacy risk.

The only way to have a privacy risk is to attach a separate metric with account aging like a central rate score. But bisq doesn't work this way so it's pretty safe. The only scenario i see is if this happen outside of Bisq. The attacker can connect to an address, like those bank account info to a crypto address that the only way.

So for this scenario of privacy breach the attacker need to perform trade in Bisq and connect dot, that require a lot of resources and discretion on community driven project. 



-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/260#issuecomment-757553619
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210110/538bf16c/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list