[bisq-network/bisq] Add option to make trade 'reason' less obvious (#2869)

[Conza]

We will soon have the removal of Trade ID requirement in description as the future default. 
Taker is not going to put in trade ID description when paying, leaving it blank. 

In conjunction with this - I am re-highlighting this below request... which should make the process more efficient (MAKER can specify an "Optional Alternate Trade ID"... perhaps this needs its own thread/discussion? 

> I still think an _**optional alternative Trade ID**_ will be a helpful addition. It's leave it blank by default, or the **MAKER** can indicate their preference for "e.g. Thanks for the collectibles", "Craiglist 2051 purchase", "Bicycle", "downpayment" etc. if I was a maker, I would get sick of having to chat about what it is the reason ID should be in trader chat. As e.g. a taker of BTC - I want to accommodate as much as possible the seller, so I become a preferred person they sell to etc.
> 
> Replicating real world transactions efficiently and conveniently is ideal. Facilitating that should be the goal by the protocol.
> It's shite it has to be done, but better than the alternatives...

This is just an additional field.

Helping facilitate communication/trader chat is also important: 
- Improve "Portfolio" icon to aid communication between traders https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5074 

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/2869#issuecomment-769474821
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210128/6f6f0c23/attachment.htm>