[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq 2.0 - Social Trading Expansion Proposal (#332)

[Andrew Kamal]

Hi, @chimp1984 
Regarding reputation, why don't we use bonded reputation or some sort of hashed pseudonymous roles/users, sort of like what was approved for #311?

The rest of the social trading protocols can integrate similar things, but everything would still be P2P and directly hashed w/ no KYC. There is no reason not to be having these features if they can be done in a privacy-preserving way.

I also think things such as lightning network integrations and pruned nodes would fix speed and latency issues where many social trading aspects similar to sites like Darwinex and eToro can be done in a platform like Bisq.

If approved, likely I can certainly could form a team or move forward w/ the funding proposal.

Just my few side notes, you are welcome to add any insight, but I do see a way that many of the original issues regarding privacy can be fixed w/ anonymity layers + I removed the non-privacy preserving optional fields from the original proposal.

Best regards, Andrew

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/332#issuecomment-863734756
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210617/9e78786d/attachment.htm>