[bisq-network/compensation] For Cycle 22 (#794)

[Chris Beams]

Update: per the discussion at https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5269#discussioncomment-425461, I will hold off on submitting this for inclusion in Cycle 22 and will batch it together with other requests in a later cycle. Mining fees are prohibitively high to make such small compensation requests economical, and there is agreement that deferral and batching is an acceptable way to go.

@bisq-network/compensation-maintainers, feel free to close this issue as `was:not submitted`, or perhaps we want a new, more explicit `was:deferred` label for situations like this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/compensation/issues/794#issuecomment-790432137
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210304/af86b4a1/attachment.htm>