[bisq-network/proposals] Reduce maximum trade size for unsigned payment accounts (#322)

sudoerD1 notifications at github.com
Sun Mar 21 23:50:27 CET 2021


I don't think limiting trade amount is the solution. After all a signed account states that the peer successfully traded ONE time (at least). To me this doesn't seem like a proper measure of a peer's reliability, a scammer could get signed before and chargeback later. 

Limiting trades is a rather unelegant and superficial way to patch the problem. I believe in giving peers the power to choose which users to accept and which not. 

Account age and signing status is not a bad idea, I remember entering Bisq the first time and feeling safe trading with a 200+ days-old peer, it just needs to be implemented better since **Bisq needs adoption
!** Limiting trades amount with this kind of fees (and the other problems) will hit everybody.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803674009
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210321/ec948104/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list