[bisq-network/bisq] New user account model (#5339)

[pazza]

I like the signing model and think it works well and reduces risks but am aware there are some concerns with it's propagation. 

I think more risks are currently posed by the account types that do not require signing.

Yesterday  I set up a Faster Payments account. I can immediately make or take trades at 0.25 BTC. 

If the goal is to make users with new accounts start trading with lower amounts first then it fails to achieve this with accounts that do not require signing.

I would be in favor of requiring signing for all accounts. This would achieve lowering the risks of users trading with stolen accounts. 

I think everyone would agree that Bisq should reduce the risk of new users trying to do chargebacks, but should Bisq also reduce the risk of new users trading using account they should not have access to?





-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5339#discussioncomment-511000
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210321/896e154e/attachment.htm>