[bisq-network/proposals] Reduce maximum trade size for unsigned payment accounts (#322)

m52go notifications at github.com
Mon Mar 22 04:23:05 CET 2021


I would say, at a bare minimum, that if signing limits are not reduced in 1.6.0, there should **at the very least** be a pop-up displayed on the make-offer screen for sellers clarifying the situation so they can deal accordingly. This might be least disruptive and most voluntary option. Maybe the ability to require that takers be signed could be added in an upcoming release, [which would absolve the need for this signing limit entirely](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803675113). @sqrrm further details such an approach [here](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5339#discussioncomment-511001).

@BtcContributor proposed making the limit 0.005 instead.

Another possibility, as suggested by @pazza83, could involve reducing the signing trade limit for some payment methods and not others, but I'm not sure if that's technically possible. Also it would further complicate the already-complicated account signing mechanism for users.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/322#issuecomment-803734499
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210321/43388dab/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list