[bisq-network/growth] Add efecty as a payment method (Colombia users) (#192)
pazza
notifications at github.com
Sat May 1 17:13:33 CEST 2021
Efecty has been scored for inclusion to Bisq:
| Essential | Desirable | Definite No’s |
| ------------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| ~~Very low risk of chargeback~~ | ~~No risk of chargeback~~ | **< very low risk of chargeback** |
| ~~Way to verify the sender in the received payment~~ | **Way to verify the sender in the received payment and ability to enter a reference** | ~~No way to verify the sender in the received payment~~ |
| **Trade time less than one week** | ~~Instant payment~~ | ~~Trade time more than one week~~ |
| **Singular Fiat currency** | ~~Multi-currency~~ | ~~Not a payment method for fiat currency~~ |
| **Significant user base** | ~~Large user base~~ | ~~No significant user base~~ |
| ~~High usability~~ | ~~High usability and great user experience~~ | **< high amount usability** |
| ~~No KYC required for sending and receiving payments~~ | **No KYC required for sending and receiving payments, allows users to trade with upmost privacy. Minimal identifying information as possible (no names, email, phone etc required)** | ~~Some KYC required (proof of address, ID, selfie) for sending and receiving payments~~ |
| ~~Low risk of scam attempts~~ | ~~Very low risk of scam attempts~~ | **< low risk of scam attempts** |
| ~~Traders can provide evidence of payment / receipt~~ | **Traders can provide evidence of payment / receipt and Verification of payment can be made using PageSigner or similar** | ~~Traders will be unable to provide evidence of payment / receipt~~ |
| **Minimum limit at least equal to at least account limits protocols** | ~~No minimum limits~~ | ~~Minimum limit not able to achieve account limits protocols~~ |
| ~~Maximum limits equal to at least 0.01 BTC~~ | ~~Large payment limits up to 2 BTC~~ | **Maximum limit is less than 0.01 BTC** |
| **Likely to increase liquidity** | ~~Likely to increase liquidity and open markets for different countries and currencies~~ | ~~Likely to decrease liquidity~~ |
| ~~Low risk of mediation~~ | ~~Very low risk of mediation~~ | **< low risk of mediation** |
| **Low risk for traders from government agencies** | ~~No risk for traders from government agencies~~ | ~~< low risk for traders from government agencies~~ |
| ~~Fees should not be a barrier to trading~~ | ~~No fees for transactions~~ | **Fees will be a barrier to trading** |
| ~~Only minor changes needed to trade protocol~~ | **No changes needed to trade protocol** | ~~> Minor changes needed to trade protocol~~ |
Score: 1/32
Percentage: 3.13%
Main problems with this are:
- Risk of chargeback
- High fees (2.7% for trades of 130 USD and, up to 10% for transactions below that amount).
- Max limit is 3,000,000 COP which is approx. $800 USD will soon be too low to reach required minimum of 0.01 BTC
- The chargeback issues would likely increase work for mediators and low transaction volumes would add not much in the way of fees.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/192#issuecomment-830647883
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210501/ef0f0b00/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the bisq-github
mailing list