[bisq-network/growth] Bonded BSQ sellers of small amounts (#243)

[pazza]

I think it would be good to develop the bonds.

Maybe some of the concerns I have come from a lack of understanding, but generally I think a bond without identification has limitations.

My concerns are:

- Reputation bonds do not link to GitHub / Keybase identity
- The user providing the reputation bond cannot with 100% certainty link the bond to their identity
- If a user's bond is to be burned then burning the bond the user provided means that stakeholders can not be certain they are voting to burn the bond of that user
- The way it is at present does not scale well

Here are a couple of sceenshots from the Bisq DAO section:

![proposal for boned role](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/66367547/116832000-b25a8980-abaa-11eb-8b74-2be88cbc2a54.PNG)
Proposal for bonded role - includes a reference to Github identify 


![Reputation bonds](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/66367547/116832014-c7cfb380-abaa-11eb-8975-390392edf6f0.PNG)
Reputation bond - no reference to Github and/or Keybase identity


Would adding Github and/or Keybase identity to the Reputation bond be simple to add? It seems like a fix to the issues I raised.




-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/243#issuecomment-830930128
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210502/c424ae97/attachment-0001.htm>