[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq 2.0 - Social Trading Expansion Proposal (#332)

pazza notifications at github.com
Sun May 9 02:29:57 CEST 2021


> However there are some power traders, market makers, etc... who prefer to be known, have a reputation and encourage return business. As long as it is voluntary I would be OK with giving them the option to use identity and reputation... as long as it is not much work for Bisq or implies that Bisq has to moderate and police these users. How can this be done? By outsourcing reputation to other platforms and allowing these traders (small in number but relevant in volume) to link to those other platforms.

I am in two minds about this.

On one hand I think it is fine to let users mention other profiles they have sales on. It is their choice.

One the other hand, I think it exposes other users to risk from regulators etc. Linking multiple account eg Bisq, Plaxful, Local Bitcoins and Hodl Holdl account together would makes any investigations easier.






-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/332#issuecomment-835592976
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210508/5315810f/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list