[bisq-network/proposals] Arbitration Action Protocol (#256)

[pazza]

Hi @leo816 

Has there been a proposal or any documentation of the following:

>Since we've experienced incidents with the Arbitrator/ Refund Agent on past trades, he has decided to stop taking care of larger trades for security reasons. 

We have a new @refund-agent2 so should there preferences be considered? or is the 0.5 BTC limit imposed as larger amounts represent a risk to the DAO?

Either way it would be good to be defined and documented in a wiki so traders of over 0.5 BTC can know what to expect.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/256#issuecomment-835939518
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210509/95b85d91/attachment.htm>