[bisq-network/growth] Add Strike App as a new payment method (#220)

HEADY_WOOK notifications at github.com
Thu May 20 07:51:39 CEST 2021


Adding Strike as a payment method does not make sense to me. To me, it only seems beneficial from a seller stand point. I will elaborate: A seller creates a sell offer and deposits collateral on Bisq, a buyer takes the offer and deposits collateral, the buyer makes a payment request to the seller and the trade is completed. However, from a buyer stand point, if someone wants to buy bitcoin, then they can deposit fiat on Strike and send BTC to themselves. Which, from a buyer POV, makes Bisq seem redundant. Why would a buyer want to use Strike as a payment method through Bisq when they can just send to themselves; especially with the collateral bit? It just doesn't make sense to me. Can someone please explain their their thinking on why adding Strike makes sense?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/220#issuecomment-844720777
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210519/a541c8d8/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list