[bisq-network/growth] Review GRIN listing on Bisq (#205)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Mon Nov 8 20:32:22 CET 2021


@cekickafa I'm skeptical about the volume that Grin could generate. But in doubt, let's list it.
@vironelo I think I'll never use Grin. Maybe I should give that a deeper thought, but there are much worse coins listed at Bisq. Listing a coin should not be equal to endorse it.
@wiz So, instead of replying to those who want to get their shitcoin listed that Bisq listings are on hold, should I reply them that new listings should be approved by the DAO? It's not a bad policy. At least it's a policy, much better than the plain hold. I still think that Bisq should take profit just by listing coins, even if they're not traded afterwards.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/205#issuecomment-963502923
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20211108/0477e8b0/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list