[bisq-network/bisq] Still v2 addresses used in BitcoinJ? (Issue #5778)

[cd2357]

Getting the same warning when using the BTC node `wizbit5555bsslwv4ctronnsgk5vh2w2pdx7v7eyuivlyuoteejk7lid.onion`:

`Oct-30 14:42:27.156 [BlockingClient network thread for wizbit5555bsslwv4ctronnsgk5vh2w2pdx7v7eyuivlyuoteejk7lid.onion/<unresolved>:8333] WARN  org.bitcoinj.core.Peer: Peer{[wizbit5555bsslwv4ctronnsgk5vh2w2pdx7v7eyuivlyuoteejk7lid.onion]:8333, version=70016, subVer=/Satoshi:0.20.99(@wiz)/, services=1037 (NETWORK, BLOOM, WITNESS, NETWORK_LIMITED), time=2021-10-30 14:42:26, height=707422}: Received unhandled message: org.bitcoinj.core.SendAddrV2Message at 2374be06`

However:
- NOT getting that warning when using my own node (also via tor v3)
- NOT getting that warning when using another of wiz's BTC nodes, `jto2jfbsxhb6yvhcrrjddrgbakte6tgsy3c3z3prss64gndgvovvosyd.onion`

@wiz any difference in setup between `wizbit5555bsslwv4ctronnsgk5vh2w2pdx7v7eyuivlyuoteejk7lid` and `jto2jfbsxhb6yvhcrrjddrgbakte6tgsy3c3z3prss64gndgvovvosyd` ? Are they running the same bisq version?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/5778#issuecomment-955204080
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20211030/c161bb8c/attachment.htm>