[bisq-network/bisq] Bisq-2 UX challenges (Discussion #5959)

[chimp1984]

A protocol requires some implementation so it cannot be added by a user like a payment method of new market.

I prefer to start with the rather constrained social trading concept where BTC sellers need to have burned BSQ as reputation.

But a more open reputation based protocol can be added later as well. I just think that the constrained version serves newbies best as there are not much options and security for small amounts should be good enough that newbies dont get scammed easily. With a more open approach users need to be more careful. Like on LBTC or Paxum where its quite some learning for newbies to not fall into the scammers many tricks.

Also other tools for providing reputation are likely less privacy friendly than burned BSQ. 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5959#discussioncomment-2118890
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/bisq/repo-discussions/5959/comments/2118890 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220205/3eebefab/attachment.htm>