[bisq-network/proposals] Used burned BSQ to become a fee receiver (Issue #359)

[MwithM]

> In the proposed model those who burn BSQ are doing that up-front, not knowing what the fee revenue will be and not knowing how many others will participate to divide the total fee revenue. So they are taking a speculative risk and need to be compensated by some profit for that. So it will be likely more expensive for the DAO. 

Indeed, I find this a great idea: 
It's a future market prediction on how many trading fees is going Bisq to get. 
It should reduce volatility as the amount of burned BSQ should be more stable than trading fees. Some periods could be very beneficial for BSQ burners, but I see it something like paying an insurance as there will also be times when volume is low and trading fees are lower than the amount of BSQ burned.

If this idea removes the burningman for trading fees, I find it completely worth.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/359#issuecomment-1022675944
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/359/1022675944 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220126/0e0f339f/attachment-0001.htm>