[bisq-network/proposals] Used burned BSQ to become a fee receiver (Issue #359)

[chimp1984]

> I thought there would be 1 single pool for all trading fees

Ah yes true that might be better. If we use the hash we can put multiple addresses in.

> blind bid phase

That would not work technically with the existing features.
But a better idea is to not bind it to a cycle as suggested above but just have a x days validity of the burned BSQ.
We could even make it dependent on the burned amount. Then we would actually price it, but it might be hard how to define the price. Similar as we do with paying for asset listing.
E.g. burning 100 BSQ gives you 10 days right to receive trade fees. If we find a way how to automatically adjust that price (the number of blocks per BSQ) that would be probably the best solution.
We could calculate at each cycle what was the real revenue in trade fee and what was burned BSQ and if the "price" was too high or too low and adjust it by DAO voting, similar as we define the fee and BSQ rate for comp. requests. But would prefer a solution without that administrative overhead.




-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/359#issuecomment-1023308303
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/359/1023308303 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220127/31f05d27/attachment.htm>