[bisq-network/bisq] Navigation Hierarchy Adjustments (Issue #6061)

[m52go]

Beyond maximalists...it's also important to consider Bisq's strengths and market positioning. It does not directly compete with big CEX offerings doing 1,000,000,000 USD per day optimized for speed with automatic order matching and a million trading pairs. It has a different appeal and a different purpose, and trying to make it look and feel like those casinos is misguided.

Bisq's UX _should_ be improved, but that should be accomplished through [novel approaches](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5959#discussioncomment-2269644) that take its unique value proposition into consideration.

Altcoin trading also never caught on despite several attempts. Why is that? I think it's because most people who trade most altcoins don't value the benefits Bisq provides, so therefore cannot justify its downsides, and so they go elsewhere to trade more conveniently. The exception is XMR, but UX-P's own research indicates many of the reasons XMR users avoid Bisq will never be addressed in Bisq 1. So why attract them to it? All of this effort is much better spent on Bisq 2 where there is actually a future for this demographic.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/issues/6061#issuecomment-1055489258
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/bisq/issues/6061/1055489258 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220301/c561b01d/attachment.htm>