[bisq-network/proposals] Have a clearly defined process for how users with accepted DAO reimbursement requests can trade with Burning Man (Issue #366)

[pazza]

> I agree with the need to clarify and point to the wiki this process.

Ok, following this proposal being resolved I will update the wiki.

> I have been https://github.com/bisq-network/roles/issues/93#issuecomment-997368810 when traders are going to need a refund, but only sometimes

Great, I have not spotted this.

> I think it's ok if I'm the one linking traders and burningman for this trades; i.e. sending a message to burningman with the offers to pick after traders announce me they're willing to sell their BSQ.

Agreed.

> Currently traders were talking directly to burningman.

> As I stated in https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/294 I don't find that promising a fixed rate is the best deal, since any other DAO participants have to deal with volatility.

My sympathies in this instance are with the partially refunded traders that have been forced to become DAO participants. I agree that DAO participants should expect volatility, but when a trader has only been partially refunded I feel the principle should be they are refunded in full.

> I should have the same deal as traders. Reimbursements are the same, the only difference is that I get a compensation and do it more often.

I would be in agreement that you should have the exact amount of BTC you paid out reimbursed.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/366#issuecomment-1059884297
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/366/1059884297 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220305/eadc201c/attachment-0001.htm>