[bisq-network/proposals] "One Cancels Other (OCO)" option to reduce reserved BTC requirements (Issue #370)

[MwithM]

> @MwithM how does my proposal differ from Bisq 2 protocols with security deposits? Is there a page I can look at for comparison?

Protocols with security deposits is what I call to what Bisq 1 is offering right now. As I don't think there are going to be any big changes in Bisq 1, I think that this proposal should be considered for Bisq 2.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/370#issuecomment-1067229318
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/370/1067229318 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220314/8fbd6995/attachment.htm>