[bisq-network/proposals] Compensation requests should be submitted only for work that has been delivered (#19)

[Chris Beams]

@ripcurlx and I just had a [chat in Slack](https://bisq.slack.com/archives/C7VK9QZRT/p1525084713000090) regarding how this and other recent proposals like #13 affect how contributors should request compensation for the various roles they play.

The short answer, is that this is an imperfect situation right now, and until we get bonding and interest payments on those bonds in place, we have to take the same best effort approach we've been taking over the last month. So nothing changes here. In particular, if you’ve been asking for lump sum compensation that includes your efforts across multiple roles in past compensation requests (like @ManfredKarrer, myself and @ripcurlx) have been doing, just keep doing so for now, and don’t change anything there until we get consensus on a new approach.

If you have further questions about this, please ask them here, or probably better, ask them in #compensation first, so that things don't get too noisy here. Then we can reflect whatever the outcome is here in a comment like I did with this one.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/19#issuecomment-385369054
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180430/1dd80503/attachment-0002.html>