[bisq-network/proposals] Listing fee policy - step 1 (general) (#35)

[Manfred Karrer]

Here a quick input from my side:
- Listing should have a fee as it creates some costs (reviewing, merging)
- We are getting too many coins listed - most of them are never traded or have very low volume 
- We have already the policy that if a coin is not traded that it gets removed (https://docs.bisq.network/exchange/howto/list-asset.html#inactive-assets-will-be-de-listed)
- We have also the policy that a controversial coin can be requested by DAO voting to get removed (https://docs.bisq.network/exchange/howto/list-asset.html#controversial-assets-may-be-put-to-a-vote)
- We don't want to add more dev effort to deal with the management of coins, specially we don't want anything that coin communities start to make advertising at our channels to get listed.
- With the DAO we will have several options (BSQ fee for listing, automatic checks for trade volume and if not reached certain threshold it gets delisted, if delisted it can get listed again by paying a fee,...). But as said we don't want to invest too much dev effort into that area.
- We could use the Bisq donation address for paying a listing fee.
- There might be legal implications, which should be thought out well.  
- Another option might be an auction: We add 3 coins each release. Best offer will be taken.

All those points are more brainstorming points and nothing is decided yet. But current state is not satisfying, so some action is required....

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/35#issuecomment-412958287
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180814/c303903e/attachment.html>