[bisq-network/proposals] Listing fee policy - step 1 (general) (#35)

[sqrrm]

I support the general direction of at least requiring that the coins getting listed pay something. At a minimum for the effort it requires from devs in terms of reviews and such. That could typically be a good starting point to see what more could be done in the future, but to keep it simple and low effort to begin with better just have a very simple requirement.

@ManfredKarrer some of those points are great but as you say, let's not make it too complicated and waste effort on it until we start with a simple requirement of covering costs.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/35#issuecomment-413261743
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180815/d604b1c8/attachment.html>