[bisq-network/proposals] Remove arbitration from the trading protocol (#52)

Extra notifications at github.com
Sun Nov 4 16:27:21 UTC 2018


I like the simplicity of having only two parties and the idea of building up online reputation.
Being able to trade at a better price, due to traders picking you for your reputation rather than price, is in a way a profit similar to the one a scammer would get from scamming minus the lost deposit/bond,
here just from doing good.

I'm a little concerned if money can be lost due to software bugs, where the arbitrator otherwise would have the ability to take action.

Donations sounds cool, though imo first priority should be to ensure the value of the Bsq token won't crash too hard, say for example around the 1st of each month or aften the token release. And right now overall 'debt' is around 3 mill if I'm correct. Of course a lot of 'debt' will be hodled by stake holders, I just stress the importance of sustainable economic housekeeping, before doing beautiful gestures like donations.   

This thread was quite a long read, maybe we could divide it into more issues each based on a conclusion or resume of a topic discussed here?

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52#issuecomment-435683798
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181104/af495f6f/attachment.html>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list