[bisq-network/proposals] Remove arbitration from the trading protocol (#52)

[chris-belcher]

>From reading the proposal, the time-locked refund transaction pays out to a donation address of a trusted entity (e.g. Tor), but the reimbursement comes from the Bisq DAO. So that means that every time a dispute happens then Tor would gain money and the DAO would lose money? (Presumably this would be expressed by the BSQ token falling in price) Would it be possible that if the rate of disputes is too high then the DAO would somehow go bankrupt?

Could it make sense to have the 2of2 refund transaction pay to an address owned by the DAO itself instead? I feel like I'm missing something, thanks in advance to anyone that explains.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/52#issuecomment-435721727
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20181104/9d8d5411/attachment-0001.html>