[bisq-network/bisq] List Doichain (DOI) (#2347)

[Bernard Labno]

It's not rejected. Adjust the code and amend commit.

Sent from ProtonMail mobile

-------- Original Message --------
On 7 Feb 2019, 09:00, Nico Krause wrote:

> @inspiraluna commented on this pull request.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In [assets/src/main/java/bisq/asset/coins/Doichain.java](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/2347#discussion_r254576471):
>
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU Affero General Public
> + * License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
> + * along with Bisq. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> + */
> +
> +package bisq.asset.coins;
> +
> +import bisq.asset.Coin;
> +import bisq.asset.DefaultAddressValidator;
> +
> +public class Doichain extends Coin {
> +
> +    public Doichain() {
> +        super("Doichain", "DOI", new DefaultAddressValidator());
>
> we are strongly based on Namecoin, so I used Namecoin as an example. This probably means this PR gets rejected. So I'll look again to find an up-to-date validator.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
> Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/2347#discussion_r254576471), or [mute the thread](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAaT2M1g28NGa0wwW_1gi48fK_vy_u4Zks5vK90zgaJpZM4abbaW).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/2347#issuecomment-461325056
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190207/0c1f7b86/attachment.html>