[bisq-network/proposals] Host downloads on self-managed server (#72)

[Harry MacFinned]

> On the other hand job delivered and BSQ issued has to be documented, 

Code is normally commented and self-documented.
Work documentation and personal private information should have nothing to do together.
The done work has not to be documented in the compensation request. The sole goal of writing compensation request is to be payed in BSQ for the achieved work. Once this is done, I don't see any utility in keeping the compensation request.

Once a compensation request has been voted, what is the utility to keep it ?
Can the stakeholders come back in 6 months and say that some compensation request was insincere and the payed BSQ must been confiscated ?
Apart the contributor himself, what will somebody do with a 6 months old compensation request ?
There is a balance to be found on the utility of archiving on one side and the potential **bad usage** on the other.

I feel that as self-filling a folder just in case the STASI will need it in the future. They'll thank us for chewing the work.

For my part, I think that the Bisq project should maybe simply recommend to contributors to keep their compensation request on their own computers.
Maybe store the compensation requests 3 months on github (to be eg used as examples for new contributors) but not more.
We may store some hash or hmac of the compensation request, but even that may be too much.

(I feel that we should separate the proposals concerning the downloads, the proposals and the compensation requests).

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/72#issuecomment-463983931
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190215/75bf08af/attachment.html>