[bisq-network/proposals] Decide on interest rate for BSQ bonds of bonded roles (#120)

[Justin Carter]

The extreme example with the DNS entry (high bond / low work load) is valid. I think it is natural to want some compensation for the opportunity cost.

One could argue the return on investment is created by keeping bisq going at all. Without a DNS holder obviously all BSQ would diminish in value, or at least growth would be slower.

I agree that the contention is around the word 'interest'. We should rethink how ongoing roles are compensated. Perhaps there should be a flat fee instead of a payment for work done.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/120#issuecomment-531110270
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190912/1cb27e9e/attachment.html>