[bisq-network/proposals] Decide on interest rate for BSQ bonds of bonded roles (#120)

[Steve Jain]

Expanding on what wiz and others have suggested...

As I see it, there are 2 ongoing elements of roles:
1. maintaining a BSQ bond
2. doing the ongoing work of the role

It's clear that charging the DAO for (1) is contentious, as it's not clear where the value is coming from or what the fairest way of capturing it is.

Maybe let's leave that aside and discuss (2), where there should be more certainty. Role owners have ongoing responsibilities that other contributors don't have that are not really deliverable. Whether it's inviting people to GitHub and setting up new roles (GitHub admin), uploading videos for others (YouTube admin), or maintaining various nodes (as sqrrm mentioned above)...there's a fair bit of day-to-day work being done by role-owners that's not being compensated.

So perhaps we should think less in terms of "interest on bond" and more in terms of "value of ongoing work". This work doesn't fit the conventions of "merged to master" or "delivered to the end user" but there's no doubt that it's valuable. 

Maybe this is a good opportunity to address this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/120#issuecomment-531087405
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20190912/4c923337/attachment.html>