[bisq-network/bisq] Reduce initial request size (#4233)

[Florian Reimair]

@freimair commented on this pull request.



> +
+    @Override
+    protected void readFromResources(String postFix) {
+        // check Version.VERSION and see if we have latest r/o data store file in working directory
+        if (!new File(absolutePathOfStorageDir + File.separator + getFileName() + "_" + Version.VERSION).exists())
+            makeFileFromResourceFile(postFix); // if we have the latest file, we are good, else do stuff // TODO are we?
+        else {
+            // load stores/storage
+            File dbDir = new File(absolutePathOfStorageDir);
+            List<File> resourceFiles = Arrays.asList(dbDir.list((dir, name) -> name.startsWith(getFileName() + "_"))).stream().map(s -> new File(s)).collect(Collectors.toList());
+
+            history = new HashMap<>();
+            store = readStore(getFileName());
+            resourceFiles.forEach(file -> {
+                SplitStore tmp = readStore(file.getName().replace(postFix, ""));
+                history.put(file.getName().replace(postFix, "").replace(getFileName(), "").replace("_", ""), tmp);

just added some additional logic to address this issue.

I could not stay true to the rest of the coding style and did my own design. And by doing that, I saved on 30 loc.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/pull/4233#discussion_r428525243
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20200521/552c2e19/attachment.html>