[bisq-network/proposals] Bisq 2.0 - Social Trading Expansion Proposal (#332)

[Félix]

@pazza83 Let me be clear about this: The Bisq default should be *privacy*. User control of funds, user control of data. No KYC, no identity. 

That is the only way to preserve censorship resistance.

However there are some power traders, market makers, etc... who prefer to be known, have a reputation and encourage return business. As long as it is voluntary I would be OK with giving them the option to use identity and reputation... as long as it is not much work for Bisq or implies that Bisq has to moderate and police these users. How can this be done? By outsourcing reputation to other platforms and allowing these traders (small in number but relevant in volume) to link to those other platforms.

I guess your idea is good... they can link from their other platforms to Bisq rather than the reverse... but it does prevent them from signalling within Bisq that they are reputable traders, which is what they want.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/332#issuecomment-835469087
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20210508/31c85fdf/attachment.htm>