[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

[MwithM]

> It seems like "someone" wants guaranteed income.... BEFORE making the product completely useful --- rather than the other way around.

I want that those who propose a coin to have skin in the game. So if someone adds a coin, it needs to generate trading fees, otherwise it's clearly not useful for Bisq or anyone, except maybe for those who can say that their alt is listed somewhere.
My idea on this issue stated that maybe this trading fees should be reimbursed, as I said on this [comment](https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-565830688):

> It's embarrassing to see such a list of not traded unknown altcoins, even if very little effort us put on it.
I completely agree on the need of requiring altcoin listing solicitors to pay BSQ to start working on them. If the altcoin is successful, they could claim some of their listing fee back.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-1094290811
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/153/1094290811 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220410/7360327b/attachment.htm>