[bisq-network/proposals] Change model for asset listing (#153)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Sun Apr 10 17:07:09 CEST 2022


> The more coins available on Bisq, the easier it is to promote and recommend Bisq. Not everything is about trading fees directed to some centralized authority.

Please read [about the DAO](https://bisq.wiki/Introduction_to_the_DAO), it looks like you have no idea about the amount of effort it took developers to create a DAO that can work on Bitcoin to reduce the main central point of failure, which is distributing revenue. 
Before the DAO existed, they worked for no profit to develop a platform that works to trade BTC for fiat. Once the product was good enough and started to attract users, they built from 0 the only DAO in Bitcoin, leaving other simpler (and more profitable) issues to a side in order to build a resilient platform. 
Bisq is a Bitcoin, not a crypto project: alts are welcome, but I don't see that listing all the coins at coinmarketcap will make Bisq better as Bisq won't find way to attract users who, for some reason, dislike Bitcoin.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/153#issuecomment-1094293470
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/153/1094293470 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220410/2d9d470c/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list