[bisq-network/bisq] Bisq-2 UX challenges (Discussion #5959)

[pazza]

Thanks for explaining. So the multiple clients should still be seen as stand-alone as most users will be using one Bisq instance on one type of client.

I assume the mobile light client will allow users to connect to their Bisq desktop or headless application? Would the UI for this similar to the mobile (semi) full node client? 

>Mobile (semi) full node client (will likely still use some specialized nodes in the network for Gossip network functionalities, but does not require running an additional full node.
This will be the client that increases accessibility by allowing users with only access to an Android phone to connect to the Bisq network.

>We don't have a dedicated mobile developer, so that would be one reason why thats rather a NO. The other is conceptually it will ad more complexity (some sort of relay nodes will be likely needed). Also for the semi-full version, it will likely only work on Android as Tor on iOS is a challenge.
Do you see Bisq-2 being developed primarily for a desktop application that can also be accessed via a mobile running Android? Could therefore a mobile option be a later addition to Bisq-2?

I guess I am asking how high up the priority list is Bisq-2 being able to be run from a mobile device? 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5959#discussioncomment-1933831
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/bisq/repo-discussions/5959/comments/1933831 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220108/5513de2d/attachment.htm>