[bisq-network/bisq] Bisq-2 UX challenges (Discussion #5959)

[Christoph Atteneder]

Looking good already! Here are my comments:

> 1. Asset selection
> Swap

I think we shouldn't use swap at this step already as the protocol will be chosen at a later stage. I'd rather go with **Exchange** or something similar.

> The amount/price section gets now visually into the background but user can still edit and change it

I'm not sure if we should let the user edit it in this screen, I'd rather offer a step back. This makes screen design more clean (keeps validation at one place) and I also think noobs are more used to this step by step (go back to previous step) methodology.



> Table with protocols show different properties. Only those which work with the selected assets are enabled for selection.
> User can select multiple. Some info icon will link to more details.

I'd only show what is possible and hide what is not. I'd go even that far to hide all possible protocols and only show our suggested one for this exchange. Letting the user open the available options if she wants to. IMO 90% will go with the suggested option. We can introduce the user to other protocol options at a later stage of her user journey in Bisq.



> ### 4. Settlement options
> Settlement options if protocol selection supports it. If the chosen protocols do not have optional settlement this section is skipped.

I'd again only show/suggest one option and let the user expand to see the other option available if she is interested.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq/discussions/5959#discussioncomment-2005106
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/bisq/repo-discussions/5959/comments/2005106 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220120/ae819e85/attachment.htm>