[bisq-network/proposals] Have BSQ on other exchanges (Issue #371)

[Conza]

> For bisq it would mean more liquidity,

I don't think it would. I think there would be a net loss. I am here, would I be if it started out as not being just 'coloured-bitcoin' but more a kin to a shit coin? No. Too easy to dismiss. 

> We have BSQ-BTC swaps, literally the first atomic swaps on bitcoin, huge! but no one knows about it.

Because of the customer experience, not branding or marketing. Consider why folks go central exchanges route compared to decentralised ; 
(1) cheaper fee's 
(2) UX 
(3) Liquidity

You get more of 3 by improving (1) and (2). Single transaction is important for (1). The multi-offer proposal helps with 3; and local community growth which is non-existent atm given basic economics (gravitating to bigger markets). 

UX was designed but looks like Bisq 2 will have to do those changes. 

The increased value comes from improving the product/customer experience; not 'selling out' to shill elsewhere to get more demand. I don't think you will get much at all; and will kill brand respect immediately. 

> How come BSQ is not even on coinmarketcap? what needs to be done to be there?

Because its not a shitcoin. 

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/371#issuecomment-1069029598
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/371/1069029598 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220316/1a79af61/attachment.htm>