[bisq-network/proposals] Have BSQ on other exchanges (Issue #371)

MwithM notifications at github.com
Wed Mar 16 13:22:13 CET 2022


The AOPP issue should teach Bisq that inviting people to use middleman services is not a good strategy.
Bisq can't ban other exchanges from listing BSQ, but actively listing it in CEX's is a bad idea, no matter if it improves liquidity and awareness. If a CEX listed BSQ, Bisq should encourage to their users to stop using it, not the opposite.
At least the AOPP defenders claimed that it made it easier for user to get control of their private keys. In this case it would be exactly the opposite.

I think that having BSQ listed on coingecko, coinmarketcap etc won't hurt. It's just a list.

BSQ is already BTC, the best way to trade it has to be at Bisq. BSQ swaps is a huge feature but it needs to grow together with Bisq's utility.

I would give to this proposal a 180º turn:
Why Bisq did not list every possible asset so any shitcoiner or simply especulator could use Bisq?
For Bisq 2, I think that alt trading should have lower trading fees (mediation is easier) and any coin with a min amount of volume at the social trading protocol should end up being listed.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/371#issuecomment-1069068478
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <bisq-network/proposals/issues/371/1069068478 at github.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20220316/084f7b99/attachment.htm>


More information about the bisq-github mailing list