[bisq-network/proposals] Change fee model to a more simple one? (#31)

[Harry MacFinned]

My feeling is that @cbeams point is very valid. Losing 1.3BTC for a 6 months period may be significant for a small business as Bisq atm.
On the other hand, simplification often leads to more business. So maybe the simplification by itself could erase the 1.3BTC loss ?
Perhaps we could just apply the simplification suggested by @ManfredKarrer , but tune the parameters in order to have only a smaller loss, let's say 0.5 BTC, which may be acceptable and may even be compensated by the positive effects of the simplification.

If we believe the simplification is "good", then this means we believe it will have a positive effect on the business. If it is not the cause, it's unuseful to discuss about simplification at all.

One point I see also concerning simplification is that it should ease the comparisons for customers. If we believe that Bisq has really a good model, this comparison should average in Bisq's favor.

In conclusion I give a :+1: to @ManfredKarrer  proposal.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/bisq-network/proposals/issues/31#issuecomment-409296349
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.bisq.network/pipermail/bisq-github/attachments/20180731/871fbab3/attachment.html>